From tale@rpi.edu Mon Oct 21 16:09:04 1991
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Path: rpi!rpi!tale
From: tale@rpi.edu (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <yrhp-q@rpi.edu>
Sender: tale@cs.rpi.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: cs.rpi.edu
Date: 21 Oct 91 05:03:32 GMT
Approved: tale@rpi.edu
Lines: 43

rec.arts.sf-reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 342:25 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 8 May 1991.
rec.arts.sf.reviews supersedes it as per the 714:86 vote in the
rec.arts.sf reorganization results announced on 13 October 1991.

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.sf.reviews	Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated)

Group submission address:   sf-reviews@presto.ig.com
Moderator contact address:  sf-reviews@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch,
                               Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop,
                               Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner)

The charter, culled from the call for votes:

	rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared
	moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical 
	reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror 
	community.  

	"Works" includes but is not limited to:  books, short stories, 
	movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media.

	"Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted
	liberally by the sitting moderator.  The discussion period for
	the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction 
	or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be 
	permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the 
	above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies).  

	Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, 
	comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, 
	reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such
	series, would most likely be permitted.  As noted, however, this 
	would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced
        by the readership.

	Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will
	single reviews of multiple works.  Comments on reviews will be 
	passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis:  generally, 
	they must say something new about the work, rather than simply 
	discussing the review.  This is not intended to stifle debate 
	but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible.

From tale@rpi.edu Wed Nov 20 09:50:17 1991
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Path: rpi!rpi!tale
From: tale@rpi.edu (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <05-qg!p@rpi.edu>
Sender: tale@cs.rpi.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: cs.rpi.edu
Date: 20 Nov 91 14:50:00 GMT
Approved: tale@rpi.edu
Lines: 43

rec.arts.sf-reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 342:25 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 8 May 1991.
rec.arts.sf.reviews supersedes it as per the 714:86 vote in the
rec.arts.sf reorganization results announced on 13 October 1991.

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.sf.reviews	Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated)

Group submission address:   sf-reviews@presto.ig.com
Moderator contact address:  sf-reviews@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch,
                               Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop,
                               Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner)

The charter, culled from the call for votes:

	rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared
	moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical 
	reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror 
	community.  

	"Works" includes but is not limited to:  books, short stories, 
	movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media.

	"Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted
	liberally by the sitting moderator.  The discussion period for
	the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction 
	or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be 
	permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the 
	above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies).  

	Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, 
	comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, 
	reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such
	series, would most likely be permitted.  As noted, however, this 
	would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced
        by the readership.

	Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will
	single reviews of multiple works.  Comments on reviews will be 
	passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis:  generally, 
	they must say something new about the work, rather than simply 
	discussing the review.  This is not intended to stifle debate 
	but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible.

From news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US Mon Dec 2 18:34:44 1991
Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!uunet!fernwood!micrognosis!news
From: news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US (news)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <439@miccal.CAMPBELL.CA.US>
Date: 2 Dec 91 20:43:04 GMT
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Distribution: micrognosis
Organization: Micrognosis, Campbell, CA  USA
Lines: 0
Approved: news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US


From damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU Wed Apr 1 16:41:03 1992
Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!UB.com!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!news.ans.net!cmcl2!exchange!damir
From: damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU (Damir Mijacika)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews
Message-ID: <23541@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU>
Date: 1 Apr 92 16:23:56 GMT
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews 
Distribution: nyu
Organization: NYU Stern School of Business
Lines: 0
Approved: damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU


From schnoebe@convex.com Wed Apr 1 22:56:42 1992
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews
Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mercury.unt.edu!mips.mitek.com!convex!schnoebe
From: schnoebe@convex.com (Eric Schnoebelen)
Subject: chkgrps mess fixup for texas.
Message-ID: <1992Apr2.023154.4094@news.eng.convex.com>
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: orion.convex.com
Organization: DFW regional news administration.
Distribution: tx
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1992 02:31:54 GMT
Approved: schnoebe@convex.com
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.
Lines: 7

Lets see if we can fix up in texas what someone else messed
up globally.  If it leaks, well, someone else gets the fruit
of my labors. :-)
-- 
Eric Schnoebelen		eric@cirr.com		schnoebe@convex.com
     "Usenet is a right, a left, a jab, and a sharp uppercut to the jaw.
	 The postman hits!  You have new mail."   -- Ed Vielmetti

From tale@uunet.uu.net Thu Apr 2 00:58:50 1992
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!uunet!tale
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <1992Apr2.054914.21297@uunet.uu.net>
Organization: UUNET Communications Services
Distribution: nyu
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1992 05:49:14 GMT
Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net

A newgroup message sent by damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU (Damir Mijacika)
erroneously unmoderated this group.  This control message is
being posted to the same group and distribution as the incorrect
message.

From steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU Sun Apr 26 12:49:21 1992
Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bu.edu!dartvax!mars.caps.maine.edu!gandalf!steve
From: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Steve E. Goldsmith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews
Message-ID: <16466@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU>
Date: 26 Apr 92 00:18:44 GMT
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews
Distribution: umcs
Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science
Lines: 0
Approved: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU


From steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU Sun Apr 26 13:24:49 1992
Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!bu.edu!dartvax!mars.caps.maine.edu!gandalf!steve
From: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Steve E. Goldsmith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <17377@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU>
Date: 26 Apr 92 01:38:49 GMT
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Distribution: umcs
Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science
Lines: 0
Approved: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU


From tale@uunet.uu.net Mon Apr 27 00:40:16 1992
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl
Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!gossip.pyramid.com!uunet!tale
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Message-ID: <1992Apr27.033220.29842@uunet.uu.net>
Organization: UUNET Technologies, Inc
Distribution: umcs
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1992 03:32:20 GMT
Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net
Lines: 9

This group was inadvertently changed to unmoderated by a leaked
newgroup message from gandalf.umcs.maine.edu.  It is properly a
moderated newsgroup.

This control message is posted to the same group and distribution as
the erroneous one.

David Lawrence
moderator, news.announce.newgroups

From news@saunix.sau.edu Fri Aug 22 12:06:01 1997
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews
Message-ID: <5tkm8v$5c180@news.sau.edu>
From: news@saunix.sau.edu
Approved: news@saunix.sau.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.sau.edu
Path: news.isc.org!vixie!data.ramona.vix.com!nnrp1.crl.com!news.znet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!globalcenter1!news.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!infeed1.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!167.142.225.6!newsrelay.netins.net!news.sau.edu!news.sau.edu
Date: 22 Aug 1997 18:37:19 GMT
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews y 
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews y 
Lines: 3
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:8849

 
Control message generated by Netscape Collabra Server.


From group-admin@isc.org Tue Sep  2 18:00:04 1997
Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back
From: group-admin@isc.org (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org
Message-ID: <873247681.5286@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:48:01 GMT
Lines: 42
X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html
	ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README
X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender
	iQCVAwUBNAyzwsJdOtO4janBAQFLeQP/XuN73NkwbnibY9zf8CiFj/Cv2Hkb+hTL
	jaTsTeJgHjjsFhYItZfYSmp8GeZzo9jFuNbmzyJ5+bJ9ijWxbIFKWWcwShPWtSaN
	caaoTzYZ/xpnlrWjeav/wp9tH9GropE/MVZn1u8jDC+Mqsw2TqrI0S+5cNcrgh3I
	ybdw5Ri3fy0=
	=c047
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9222

rec.arts.sf.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 714:86 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 13 Oct 1991.

Group submission address:   sf-reviews@postmodern.com
Moderator contact address:  sf-reviews@postmodern.com
                (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper,
                 Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner)

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.sf.reviews	Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated)


The charter, culled from the call for votes:

        rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared
        moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical 
        reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror 
        community.  

        "Works" includes but is not limited to:  books, short stories, 
        movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media.

        "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted
        liberally by the sitting moderator.  The discussion period for
        the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction 
        or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be 
        permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the 
        above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies).  

        Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, 
        comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, 
        reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such
        series, would most likely be permitted.  As noted, however, this 
        would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced
        by the readership.

        Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will
        single reviews of multiple works.  Comments on reviews will be 
        passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis:  generally, 
        they must say something new about the work, rather than simply 
        discussing the review.  This is not intended to stifle debate 
        but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible.

From tale@uunet.uu.net Wed Sep  3 00:15:03 1997
Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated
Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org
Message-ID: <873270000.6284@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:00:00 GMT
Lines: 42
X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html
	ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README
X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender
	iQCVAwUBNA0K8cJdOtO4janBAQHvHAQAoyHZBUcdDqL1hkW1pvCwgFUW/TpKy2sy
	SZVAme27sII8u5HYqUvnDerKaql5B1FyTMFC3rkHa0cxOIMU8mZUa1ac/dlFDv97
	gKB99dYjwZjAqEJyAs9kQsdwU49YHpdqd1FCdvGkclIod+HRIXqpVegNR5dJXPJo
	W3YmuRqgzeE=
	=ytAH
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9240

rec.arts.sf.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 714:86 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 13 Oct 1991.

Group submission address:   sf-reviews@postmodern.com
Moderator contact address:  sf-reviews@postmodern.com
                (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper,
                 Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner)

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.sf.reviews	Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated)


The charter, culled from the call for votes:

        rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared
        moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical 
        reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror 
        community.  

        "Works" includes but is not limited to:  books, short stories, 
        movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media.

        "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted
        liberally by the sitting moderator.  The discussion period for
        the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction 
        or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be 
        permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the 
        above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies).  

        Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, 
        comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, 
        reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such
        series, would most likely be permitted.  As noted, however, this 
        would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced
        by the readership.

        Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will
        single reviews of multiple works.  Comments on reviews will be 
        passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis:  generally, 
        they must say something new about the work, rather than simply 
        discussing the review.  This is not intended to stifle debate 
        but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible.

