From tale@uunet.uu.net Thu Mar 11 12:13:37 1993
Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews
Path: uunet!tale
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net
Sender: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Organization: UUNET Technologies, Inc
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1993 17:13:27 GMT
Message-ID: <C3qIIF.HDM@uunet.uu.net>
Lines: 64
Xref: uunet control:581244

rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993.

Group submission address:   trek-review-l@cornell.edu
Moderator contact address:  mss1@cornell.edu (Michael Shappe)

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.startrek.reviews	Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated)

The charter, culled from the call for votes:

Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews
of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes"
in the rest of the charter, for brevity).  It is open to all incarnations
of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and
any others that pop up in the future.

A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses
and justifies an opinion about a particular episode.  The moderator has the
power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group.  Articles
may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be
rejected for either of the following reasons, among others:

- The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any
  discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion
  ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking
  insight into the episode.
- The article is very poorly written.  The moderator would be expected to
  be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent
  messages that don't convey any clear opinion.  

Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other
more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the
future.

Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group
(e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still
enjoy the same reviews they always have.  Reviewers may request that their
reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate
discussion group in any case.

All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive
Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as
standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review.

The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers
to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to
this charter.  This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of
the moderator going on vacation.  A regular reviewer is anyone who has
submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections.  If one
of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as
determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in
question.

Subject lines will look like this:

Subject: <show> <type> Review: <title>

Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE,
BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article,
which must include the name of the episode.  The moderator may add keywords
to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if
another <type> is needed.  Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title
(Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone").

From news@saunix.sau.edu Fri Aug 22 12:06:06 1997
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews
Message-ID: <5tkmfu$5c197@news.sau.edu>
From: news@saunix.sau.edu
Approved: news@saunix.sau.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.sau.edu
Path: news.isc.org!vixie!data.ramona.vix.com!nnrp1.crl.com!news.znet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!globalcenter1!news.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!infeed2.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!167.142.225.6!newsrelay.netins.net!news.sau.edu!news.sau.edu
Date: 22 Aug 1997 18:41:02 GMT
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews y 
Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews y 
Lines: 3
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:8851

 
Control message generated by Netscape Collabra Server.


From group-admin@isc.org Tue Sep  2 18:00:11 1997
Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back
From: group-admin@isc.org (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org
Message-ID: <873247789.5311@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:49:50 GMT
Lines: 64
X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html
	ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README
X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender
	iQCVAwUBNAy0LsJdOtO4janBAQG2OwP+J7MslzEWmyhQRZ/RlGcuiVdtP0jDTMTL
	SA0QaCHMD8BuWWzhf2F2JP6frbkHIplVTPRasRrBS/2OPsJ2nt43Qu/UR9DCAMGJ
	WFMxLzfmbnjvpbIGGECbwevdzNDCNPvIF2D2WVTAx7gwf/OwmKbULUyAx0Uw4FpI
	YxsWqQnRIBc=
	=t+pD
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9223

rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993.

Group submission address:   trek-reviews@ravenna.com
Moderator contact address:  trek-reviews-request@ravenna.com (Scott Forbes)

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.startrek.reviews	Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated)

The charter, culled from the call for votes:

Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews
of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes"
in the rest of the charter, for brevity).  It is open to all incarnations
of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and
any others that pop up in the future.

A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses
and justifies an opinion about a particular episode.  The moderator has the
power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group.  Articles
may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be
rejected for either of the following reasons, among others:

- The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any
  discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion
  ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking
  insight into the episode.
- The article is very poorly written.  The moderator would be expected to
  be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent
  messages that don't convey any clear opinion.  

Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other
more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the
future.

Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group
(e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still
enjoy the same reviews they always have.  Reviewers may request that their
reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate
discussion group in any case.

All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive
Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as
standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review.

The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers
to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to
this charter.  This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of
the moderator going on vacation.  A regular reviewer is anyone who has
submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections.  If one
of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as
determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in
question.

Subject lines will look like this:

Subject: <show> <type> Review: <title>

Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE,
BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article,
which must include the name of the episode.  The moderator may add keywords
to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if
another <type> is needed.  Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title
(Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone").

From tale@uunet.uu.net Wed Sep  3 00:15:04 1997
Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews
Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated
Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org
Message-ID: <873270001.6296@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:00:01 GMT
Lines: 64
X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html
	ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README
X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender
	iQCVAwUBNA0K8sJdOtO4janBAQE1rgP/ZZkXiH5+cP0YDV+YABmB8p+BBVQj+kDf
	byq3jUJk2cPvQnZRSbIKxRfHOZc+zpAaXt8F6+bLS+aI2CDWxw67xgXZc5XZZ7Ov
	M1bdBINJYEmPr3s81XoPo4ZF3Y37DZYfgz9oc4qNCB0JEUOjI5dLW8OJ6bfAPznH
	NN3EIMmMnDE=
	=1U7u
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9241

rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993.

Group submission address:   trek-reviews@ravenna.com
Moderator contact address:  trek-reviews-request@ravenna.com (Scott Forbes)

For your newsgroups file:
rec.arts.startrek.reviews	Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated)

The charter, culled from the call for votes:

Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews
of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes"
in the rest of the charter, for brevity).  It is open to all incarnations
of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and
any others that pop up in the future.

A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses
and justifies an opinion about a particular episode.  The moderator has the
power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group.  Articles
may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be
rejected for either of the following reasons, among others:

- The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any
  discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion
  ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking
  insight into the episode.
- The article is very poorly written.  The moderator would be expected to
  be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent
  messages that don't convey any clear opinion.  

Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other
more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the
future.

Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group
(e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still
enjoy the same reviews they always have.  Reviewers may request that their
reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate
discussion group in any case.

All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive
Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as
standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review.

The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers
to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to
this charter.  This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of
the moderator going on vacation.  A regular reviewer is anyone who has
submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections.  If one
of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as
determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in
question.

Subject lines will look like this:

Subject: <show> <type> Review: <title>

Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE,
BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article,
which must include the name of the episode.  The moderator may add keywords
to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if
another <type> is needed.  Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title
(Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone").

